Exhibition reviews, photography and other ideas
Recent Posts"The Interview" by the Gao Brothers, Saathci Gallery "Pangea II" PHOTOGRAPHY AND THE HISTORICISM OF POVERTY: Shirley Baker at the Photographers' Gallery PONTE CITY, Scottish National Portrait Gallery, 6 December 2014-26 April 2015 CHRIS STEIN’S PHOTOS OF DEBBIE HARRY – the journey of a personal archive CONSTRUCTING WORLDS: PHOTOGRAPHY AND ARCHITECTURE IN THE MODERN AGE, Barbican Art Gallery THINKING ABOUT EDWARD STEICHEN – the architectonic use of light A MASTER OF CAR PHOTOGRAPHY - Peter Harholdt's set up 'PWA MODERNE' - US Depression-era architecture ELGER ESSER'S PHOTOGRAPHY - a new romanticism? RUTH BERNHARD: BODY AND FORM - Florida Museum of Photographic Arts, Tampa.
HUNGARIAN PHOTOGRAPHY IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY
Most serious photographers will have visited the Royal Academy’s recent exhibition “Eyewitness - Hungarian photography in the twentieth century” during its run. Like me, you probably went several times to see this incredible collection of over 200 images from some of the greatest photographers of the last century.
In 1931, eight Hungarian photographers figured in Modern Photography’s list of the best 100 photographs in the world - more than any other nation. It’s interesting to consider the extent to which these images could be considered part of a single Hungarian School, or whether they are the works of individual photographers who happened to be Hungarian.
The Hungarian tradition inevitably centres around its five most famous exponents - Brassai, Robert Capa, Andre Kertesz, Laslo Maholy-Nagy and Martin Munkacsi. All left Hungary to live and work in west European or American cities, bringing their native grounding to photojournalism, fashion, reportage and art photography. But did that grounding engender a commonality of style?
Early Hungarian photography did seem to draw on distinctly national themes. Rudolf Balogh and Erno Vadas’ images of the Hungarian landscape, farmers, shepherds, harvests, and even urban industrial themes, speak to a concern to use photography to convey Hungarian culture. A “Magayar Style” seems, at least briefly, to have emerged: these images showed an acute sense of light and shade, carefully considered and cropped compositions, strong graphical lines, but all linked with a profound sense of humanity.
As the key figures left Hungary, their concerns and styles inevitably changed and developed. Brassai left Hungary early to work as a journalist in Berlin and Paris. Under Kertesz’ influence, he took up photography and his Paris de nuit (1932) was a huge success. Capa also came from journalism: moving to Berlin, Paris and America, his reputation was established by his images from the Spanish Civil War and he continued photographing conflicts through to Vietnam in the 1950s. Kertesz moved to work in photojournalism in Paris in 1925 relocating to America in 1936. Maholy-Nagy developed his photographic skills at the Bauhaus in the 1920s whilst Munkasci revolutionised fashion photography in the US in the 1930s after a spell in Berlin.
Yet, throughout these widely differing concerns, key creative elements recur. The success of Brassai’s book Nuits de Paris must surely rest on the striking use of light and dark and strong lines which Paris’ newly-installed electric lighting created on the wet cobblestones and street patterns.
Capa is best known for his iconic image from the Spanish Civil War, but we see how his style of war photography developed to become less formal, more humanist, but the more powerful for it. Second World War images of American pilots or civilians drinking tea show this, while Woman who had a child with german soldier is quite chilling.
We must finish with Kertesz, the oldest of the five and perhaps the most Hungarian rooted. The cropping of Elizabeth and I reveals so much by hiding so much. But it must be the stunning graphics of Landing Pigeon, Lost Cloud and Washington Square that best illustrate the native tradition of which he was an early pupil.
No comments posted.